Traffic congestion what is it

Pricing is a bitter pill — no one wants to pay for something they are accustomed to getting free — but it is the medicine that works. Cities have tried for decades to reduce congestion by adding new freeway lanes and expanding rail transit systems. These efforts do not work, because they mistakenly assume that the current amount of traffic on our roads represents the total amount of traffic possible — essentially, that everyone who would like to be driving on a busy road already is.

Were this the case, then pulling a driver off the freeway at 6 p. Adding another lane to the freeway would have the same effect. But the fact is the drivers we see on freeways at busy times are only the tip of an iceberg — many people would like to drive on that road at that time of day.

There are drivers who would ideally travel at 6 p. There are others who choose to travel at 6 p. There are people who travel at 6 p.

And there are people sitting at home who would make a trip on the at 6 p. When the road becomes less crowded — as it momentarily would if we add a lane or a train — some of these people will converge onto the at 6 p. Latent demand is the reason that new capacity cannot reduce congestion.

Congestion itself is a cost of driving, so reducing congestion makes driving less expensive. Congestion pricing works for precisely this reason. We need tolls — lots of them. Traffic Congestion is Counter-Intuitive, and Fixable. Rethinking Traffic Congestion. The Political Calculus of Congestion-Pricing. Why does this happen? After a new highway is added or an existing one widened, initially there are fewer traffic jams and trips become quicker.

Drivers who had previously avoided that route because of congestion now consider it as an attractive choice. Others who previously used public transportation, bicycles or other modes of transportation may shift to using their cars.

Some people might change their time of travel — instead of travelling in off-peak times to avoid congestion, they start travelling in peak-times, increasing congestion.

Hence, as more people start using the highway, initial time-saving effects are reduced and eventually disappear. Katy Freeway in Houston, Texas , illustrates this problem. With its 26 lanes, it is considered as the widest highway in North America. Not long after, however, congestion actually worsened. When looking at top ten cities for time lost due to congestion in , eight are European. Some roads predate the arrival of cars, increasing the complexity of road projects.

In fact, car-centric infrastructure in a sense collides with ancient street patterns, public transit and walking development patterns. At the same time, European cities tend to be most progressive when it comes to reducing and relocating road space to make room for other types of transportation. Zurich, for example, deliberately slowed its road traffic down to make itless popular, while Paris has pursued a policy of expanding space dedicated to buses, bicycles and pedestrians, while reducing that once turned over exclusively to cars.

In the city of London implemented a congestion charge in the attempt to turn away motorists from driving to other means of travel. It functions on a fairly simple basis: vehicles entering the Congestion Charging Zone of central London from 7 a.

Coupled with other actions, several important contributions were achieved. Simultaneously, a well-established shift toward public transportation is evident. So accidents could only have caused more congestion because roads were more crowded, and each accident may now cause longer back-ups than before.

Incidents are non-accident causes of delay, such as stalled cars, road repairs, overturned vehicles, and bad weather. No one knows how many incidents occur, but it is a much greater number than accidents. And the number of incidents probably rises along with total driving. So that could have added to greater congestion, and will in the future.

Another crucial factor contributing to traffic congestion is the desire of most Americans to live in low-density settlements. Eighty-three percent of respondents chose the larger, farther-out suburban home. At the same time, new workplaces have been spreading out in low-density areas in most metropolitan regions. Past studies, including one published in by Boris S. Pushkarev and Jeffery M. Zupan, have shown that public transit works best where gross residential densities are above 4, persons per square mile; relatively dense housing is clustered close to transit stations or stops; and large numbers of jobs are concentrated in relatively compact business districts.

But in , at least two thirds of all residents of U. Those densities are too low for public transit to be effective. Hence their residents are compelled to rely on private vehicles for almost all of their travel, including trips during peak hours. But most residents of those neighborhoods vehemently oppose raising densities, and most American regions already have densities far too low to support much public transit.

So this strategy would not reduce future traffic congestion much. Peak-hour road pricing would not be politically feasible if policymakers put tolls on all major commuter lanes, but HOT lanes can increase traveler choices by adding new toll lanes to existing expressways, or converting underused high-occupancy vehicle HOV lanes to HOT lanes, and leaving present conventional lanes without tolls. True, HOT lanes do not eliminate congestion.

But they allow anyone who needs to move fast on any given day to do so, without forcing all low-income drivers off those same roads during peak periods. In some regions, whole networks of HOT lanes could both add to overall capacity and make high-speed choices always available to thousands of people in a hurry. Respond more rapidly to traffic-blocking accidents and incidents. Removing accidents and incidents from major roads faster by using roving service vehicles run by government-run Traffic Management Centers equipped with television and electronic surveillance of road conditions is an excellent tactic for reducing congestion delays.

Build more roads in growing areas. Opponents of building more roads claim that we cannot build our way out of congestion because more highway capacity will simply attract more travelers. Due to triple convergence, that criticism is true for established roads that are already overcrowded. But the large projected growth of the U. Install ramp-metering. This means letting vehicles enter expressways only gradually.

It has improved freeway speed during peak hours in both Seattle and the Twin Cities, and could be much more widely used. Use Intelligent Transportation System devices to speed traffic flows. These devices include electronic coordination of signal lights on local streets, large variable signs informing drivers of traffic conditions ahead, one-way street patterns, Global Positioning System equipment in cars and trucks, and radio broadcasts of current road conditions.

These technologies exist now and can be effective on local streets and arteries and informative on expressways. HOV lanes have proven successful in many areas such as Houston. More regions could use HOV lanes effectively if there were more lanes built for that purpose, rather than trying to convert existing ones. Merely converting existing lanes would reduce overall road capacity. Demonstration programs have shown that if firms offer to pay persons now receiving free employee parking a stipend for shifting to carpooling or transit, significant percentages will do so.

That could reduce the number of cars on the road. However, this tactic does not prevent the offsetting consequences of triple convergence. Restrict very low-density peripheral development. Learn the basics of fuel tracking in MyGeotab and discover strategies for increasing fuel efficiency. October 7, Discover the best tires to equip your vehicles with depending on the needs and location of your fleet operations.

September 30, Learn how to improve customer satisfaction by optimizing your routing using reports in MyGeotab. Learn the key benefits of vehicle maintenance software. August 4, Skip to main content. What causes traffic congestion? See also : How autonomous driving will change our highways and cities What are GPS jammers and how do you combat them? Types of congestion There are two overall types of traffic congestion, according to the Department of Transportation : recurring and non-recurring.

Environment A study by Dr. Mechanical Another factor that can cause traffic congestion is the case of a mechanical failing. Human The all-too-common cause of traffic is humans. Just taking a quick look at some traffic fatality statistics from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration gives a plain view at the chaos our decisions can cause on the road: There were 29 alcohol-impaired driving fatalities per day.

This number has been steadily increasing over the last few years. Read the Geotab report: Predicting traffic congestion with driving behavior The even-worse situation is when that last-minute braking scenario turns into a fender bender. Infrastructure Another category that could also arguably be human-caused is infrastructure. See also: Podcast: Smart Cities and data-driven traffic Getting control of the causes While environmental factors are outside of our control, technology provides some hope in solving the traffic challenges.

If you liked this post, let us know!